All Shook Up

OPERATIONS SECURITY - OPERATIONS SECURITY - OPERATIONS SECURITY - OPERATIONS SECURITY. Everyone - say it with me now: OPERATIONS SECURITY!

If I read one more article, speech or blog entry that defines OPSEC as Operational Security I’m gonna go Elvis on my computer monitor. People, this isn’t difficult. Operations Security is a different concept than operational security. I’m not gonna go into a long dissertation about the difference because you should know what the difference is. But even as I write those words I realize I’m wrong. Generals, Lt Col’s, Master Sergeants, CIO’s even OPSEC Managers have written, or spoken operational security when speaking of OPSEC. And not just in general but typically something like this: “OPSEC, or Operational Security, is a 5-step…”
I honestly don’t know why this happens or what to do about it - I just know that every time it happens it sets us back just a little bit. OPSEC has a hard enough time getting accepted without people who should know better defining it incorrectly. In the world of OPSEC there is much room for disagreement on a number of topics but this isn’t one of them.
Which comes first; Threat or Critical Information development? Argue that all you want.
How should you define risk? Take sides and come out swinging.
What is the best way to prioritize vulnerabilities? Jump into the octagon and figure it out.
But - “Is it Operations Security or operational security?” is not open to debate.
So, to all of you getting it wrong I say: STOP THAT!

Keep the Faith!
Revelator

All Shook Up - Elvis

This entry was posted on 17. December 2009 at 19:34 and is filed under BS, General OPSEC. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

| Print